RESUMO
Cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy are rare but account for complications that pose risks to the mother as well as the child. In patients with fixed cardiac output due to stenotic valvular lesion(s), the physiological changes during pregnancy carry high risk of morbidity and mortality. Case Presentation: Our patient was diagnosed with severe mitral and aortic stenosis at her first antenatal visit at 24 weeks of gestation. She was also diagnosed with intrauterine growth restriction and was therefore planned to be operated on at a gestational age of 34 weeks. After careful selection of monitoring and anesthetic regime, the patient was managed without any intraoperative or postoperative complications. Clinical Discussion: This case reports how the anesthetists, obstetricians, and cardiac surgeons devised a well-designed plan to operate on a patient with a relatively rare disease manifestation. Our patient had coexisting severe stenotic lesions of both mitral and aortic valves and posed a clinical dilemma regarding the choice of anesthesia and perioperative management. Regardless of the anesthetic technique, goals for a patient with the combined valvular disease include maintenance of adequate preload, systemic vascular resistance, cardiac contractility, sinus rhythm and avoidance of tachycardia, bradycardia, aortocaval compression, and anesthetic or surgery-induced hemodynamic changes. Conclusion: The course of management would give clinicians an idea of how to manage a patient with combined stenotic valvular lesions for cesarean section, ensuring a smooth course and a safe postoperative period.
RESUMO
Background and Aim: Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and local anesthetic infiltration (LAI) technique are used as part of the multimodal analgesic regimen after abdominal surgery. Postoperative opioid consumption and analgesic efficacy was compared using TAP and LAI techniques in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery in a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Material and Methods: Total of 135 patients scheduled for major gynecological surgeries were allocated into three groups: group T received bilateral TAP block with bupivacaine 0.25%; group I received LAI with 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine 5 µ/mL in the peritoneum and abdominal wall, and group C was control group. Anesthesia and postoperative analgesia were standardized. Outcome measures were cumulative and rescue tramadol consumption, numerical rating score (NRS) for pain and side effects in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) at 4, 8, 12 hours postoperatively. Results: Tramadol consumption, need for rescue analgesia, and NRS for pain between three groups at 4, 8, and 12 hours postoperatively had no statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). In PACU, median tramadol consumption used for rescue analgesia between group T (15 (15-30)) and group C (30 (15-45)) (P = 0.035), and between group T (15 (15-30)) and group I (30 (15-52)) was statistically significant (P = 0.034). In PACU, the percentage of patients having NRS >4 on movement in group C (72%) compared to group T (46.5%) and group I (46.5%) was significant (P = 0.034). No statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of side effects among study groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Except for the immediate postoperative period, neither TAP block nor LAI had added benefit to the multimodal analgesia regimen in patients undergoing gynecological surgeries.
